[infod-wg] Optional association fields

[Dieter Gawlick]

Steve,

all we need to do is to extend existing use cases, I could use the Car 
Use Case as well. Actually, we did not cover all functionally anyway. As 
far as I remember, nobody used REPLACE or DROP yet. Do you feel we have 
to make sure that all functions are used?

Dieter

Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
> It may be that as you don't have an example yet - but need to add one -
> that this does not belong in the base spec. Do people consider it to be
> somehow fundamental?
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-infod-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-infod-wg at ggf.org] 
>> On Behalf Of Dieter Gawlick
>> Sent: 28 April 2006 17:11
>> To: Fisher, SM (Steve)
>> Cc: Ronny Fehling; Stephen Davey; infod-wg at ggf.org
>> Subject: Re: [infod-wg] Optional association fields
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> We could use the Sensor Use Case to provide an example. Once 
>> Arjun and Ronny are mostly done it is easy to add. Please add 
>> this as an action item for Arjun, Ronny and I.
>>
>> Dieter
>>
>>
>> Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote: 
>>
>> 	Do you have a example of the use of the fieature in the 
>> current use case
>> 	doc? 
>> 	
>> 	  
>>
>> 		-----Original Message-----
>> 		From: owner-infod-wg at ggf.org 
>> [mailto:owner-infod-wg at ggf.org] 
>> 		On Behalf Of Dieter Gawlick
>> 		Sent: 28 April 2006 15:07
>> 		To: Fisher, SM (Steve)
>> 		Cc: Ronny Fehling; Stephen Davey; infod-wg at ggf.org
>> 		Subject: Re: [infod-wg] Optional association fields
>> 		
>> 		Steve,
>> 		
>> 		we should have one field; but it should allow multiple 
>> 		property constraints; i.e., constraints against 
>> more than one 
>> 		property vocabulary.
>> 		
>> 		Dieter
>> 		
>> 		Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
>> 		    
>>
>> 			Hi,
>> 			
>> 			Do we have a compelling reason to keep 
>> the two optional association 
>> 			fields for property constraints of the 
>> association and for 
>> 			      
>>
>> 		policy of 
>> 		    
>>
>> 			the association.
>> 			
>> 			If not we should get rid of them - or 
>> explain what they are
>> 			
>> 			Do they appear in any exisiting use case?
>> 			
>> 			Steve
>> 			
>> 			  
>> 			      
>>
>> 		
>> 		    
>>
>> 	
>> 	  
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/infod-wg/attachments/20060429/9dcf8ba0/attachment.htm