[infod-wg] INFOD conference call on Thursday, May 19 2005 @ 9 am

[Steve Fisher]

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 06:23:59PM -0700, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
> I've been having tooling difficulties (still am). But to give you an idea 
> of how I've been thinking about modeling for UML, I've attached a diagram 
> generated from a set of minimalist Java classes. For some reason, I can't 
> get the 1-1 and 1-* relationships in place, but it gives an idea of how 
> things could be laid out. (It also suggests a few things, for example that 
> INFOD_Vocabularies might want to move out of the constraint section, so 
> that the subclassing between Entity and Artifact is a bit more strict, 
> though this isn't terribly important.)
> 
> I'll translate this to the UML tooling next. It would be nice if we could 
> find some open source/public domain tooling for manipulating this stuff, so 
> everyone can take a crack at it...

argouml works pretty well for simple UML diagrams

http://argouml.tigris.org/

Steve

> 
> chris
> 
>