[gsa-rg] First framework of GSA-Requirements Document

[Philipp Wieder]

Hi Jarek,

it is definitely possible to contribute a use case, since every use case 
will help us to get a more precise understanding of the required 
functions, properties and services we need. With respect to the focus it 
would be helpful if the use case concentrates more on the scheduling 
processes and requirements than on describing an existing solution. This 
make it easier to compare the different use cases and incorporate the 
results into the requirements section (see also the following thread 
form the GSA list 
http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/gsa-rg/2004/07/msg00000.html).

Thank you, Philipp.

Jarek Nabrzyski wrote:

> Ramin Yahyapour wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> finally I and Philip Wieder found the necessary time to start the 
>> work on the GSA framework document which had been discussed at the 
>> last GGF meeting in Brussels. We copied the items we had during our 
>> GGF session into
>> corresponding sections in Sect. 3. In the next step, we can split up the
>> work to extend the different sections. Several people volunteered to 
>> work as editors on this document for the different parts for required 
>> services, protocols for a Grid Scheduling Architecture. I would 
>> suggest that we should get a first complete draft ready to be 
>> presented and discussed at the next GGF in Korea. It would be great 
>> if we can split up the work accordingly.
>> Maybe the volunteers from the Brussels meeting as well as whoever 
>> else would like to join the work can indicate in which part the feel 
>> they would
>> like contribute.
>>
>> Any other commments are of course also appreciated.
>> BTW, we added an additional section for linking to OGSA. We have been 
>> asked from the OGSA design team for Execution Management Services to 
>> contribute
>> to their work. This could be link were we can combine the efforts.
>>
>> Ramin
>>
> Dear Ramin and Philipp,
> I will contribute to the Requirements section. do you think it is 
> still possible to contribute a use case?
>
> Cheers,
> Jarek
>