[gsa-rg] Confession and status: update

[Philipp Wieder]

Hi Ariel,

thanks for your reply.

Ariel Oleksiak wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> I volunteered to take care of the requirement description in section 2.2 (I
> think you mentioned that you want to deal with this section too?) and
> requirements for performance prediction service. There is no separate
> section for the latter so far but I think we agreed that these requirements
> should be included in the document as well.

Yes, let us take care of Section 2.2 together. I also got an off-line 
offer to help with this part. Once we have a list of people working on 
that part, we may shortly discuss (via Skype?) the direction we want to 
drive this.
And yes, we agreed (see the minutes in memory :-)) to have a performance 
prediction part, too. I think it is good, if you take care of this one.

Best regards, Philipp.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ariel
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Philipp Wieder" <ph.wieder at fz-juelich.de>
> To: <gsa-rg at ggf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [gsa-rg] Confession and status: update
> 
> 
> 
>>Dear All,
>>
>>Rion wrote me that he will take care of the accounting service part,
>>thanks for that.
>>
>>Please find the current version of the Requirements document at
>>
> 
> https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/gsa-rg/document/GSA-RequirementsV1.2.doc/en/1.
> 
>>Volunteers for the different section are still welcome.
>>
>>Best regards, Philipp.
>>
>>Philipp Wieder wrote:
>>
>>>Dear All,
>>>
>>>unfortunately I have to confess that the ASCII file which should
>>>comprise the GGF14 minutes is empty. Sorry for that. Fortunately memory
>>>serves well and the actions are not lost.
>>>
>>>Ad 1. The use case document (see
>>>
> 
> https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/gsa-rg/document/GridSchedulingUseCasesV1.3.doc/en/1)
> 
>>>has been updated again and now includes the Calana use case submitted by
>>>Mathias. In addition we added a brief section with common Grid
>>>scheduling usage patterns. This should help people to get an idea where
>>>their use case fits in. Please comment on the document since we plan to
>>>submit it to the public comment soon.
>>>
>>>Ad 2. Service requirements document
>>>Due to the unpleasant fact reported above we do not have the list who
>>>took the responsibility for what service, but we still remember who
>>>volunteered:
>>>- Mathias
>>>- Rion
>>>- Soonwook
>>>- Wolfgang
>>>Could all of you please confirm that and say which service(s) you
>>>volunteered to take care of. This would help very much to continue with
>>>the document.
>>>
>>>In addition I would like to direct your attention to a newly created GGF
>>>group, the OGSA Resource Selection Services WG (see
>>>https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-rss-wg/). The GridForge page
>>>is due to the short lifetime of the group still a preliminary one, but
>>>you can follow the progress of the group via the ogsa-rss-bof at ggf.org
>>>mailing list. Currently the group reviews the GSA use case document to
>>>gather requirements for their work.
>>>
>>>Best regards, Philipp.
>>>
>>
>>
> 
>