[gridcpr-wg] Use Cases for Grid Checkpoint and Recovery - Comments
Paul Stodghill
stodghil at cs.cornell.edu
Fri Oct 21 07:48:11 CDT 2005
I'm not sure what difference this makes. For instance, for the
applications that you have in mind, what is the difference between
modelling them as having a null computation vs. no computation at all?
Thanks for your comment.
guru prasad wrote:
>
> 1) Figure 1 and lines 253 - 255
>
> *The first thing to notice **is that the box labelled "Application"
> contains a box labelled "Computation". Some of the use-cases envisions
> an existing computation being directly modified to interact with a
> GridCPR system.*
>
>
>
> This places an assumption on the application to have "computation" as
> a part of the application. But when I think of in general and the
> applied fields of Grid Computing, not all the applications have
> computing as a part of it. (Eg. An application to collect all the
> x-ray of a user from a remote server, diagnosis report from yet
> another and consolidate both to produce a report and submit it to a
> third location).
>
>
>
> I am not sure if we are not handling such applications. But I feel we
> need to define a solid boundary for "application" type.
>
> <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/gridcpr-wg/attachments/20051021/78dff34b/attachment.htm
More information about the gridcpr-wg
mailing list