[gridcpr-wg] Use Cases for Grid Checkpoint and Recovery - Comments

Paul Stodghill stodghil at cs.cornell.edu
Fri Oct 21 07:52:20 CDT 2005


I agree that we need to define it, but do we need to do so in the 
Use-Case document? Do you see any requirements that are missing or would 
be more clearly specified if we defined a storage model more clearly in 
the Use-Case document?

Thanks for your comment.

guru prasad wrote:

> *2) **Checkpoint data management. *Once the checkpoint data has been 
> created, it needs to be managed. For example, *there needs to 
> functions for deleting checkpoint data that is no longer needed. Also, 
> this API should provide a **mechanism for querying the meta-data that 
> is associated with checkpoint data.*
>
>  
> I understand that Checkpoint has to be stored somewhere to be able to 
> delete or query the meta-data. It is said tacitly in the above 
> paragraph. But I feel we have to define the storage of checkpoint also 
> as this is a big question in its own. This will have implications on 
> Authentication, Authorization, Accounting, and also maintain the Data 
> Integrity.
> <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/gridcpr-wg/attachments/20051021/4b4c2a15/attachment.html 


More information about the gridcpr-wg mailing list