[gridcpr-wg] Use Cases for Grid Checkpoint and Recovery - Comments

Paul Stodghill stodghil at cs.cornell.edu
Fri Oct 21 07:48:11 CDT 2005


I'm not sure what difference this makes. For instance, for the 
applications that you have in mind, what is the difference between 
modelling them as having a null computation vs. no computation at all?

Thanks for your comment.

guru prasad wrote:

>  
> 1) Figure 1 and lines 253 - 255
>
> *The first thing to notice **is that the box labelled "Application" 
> contains a box labelled "Computation". Some of the use-cases envisions 
> an existing computation being directly modified to interact with a 
> GridCPR system.*
>
>  
>
> This places an assumption on the application to have "computation" as 
> a part of the application. But when I think of in general and the 
> applied fields of Grid Computing, not all the applications have 
> computing as a part of it. (Eg. An application to collect all the 
> x-ray of a user from a remote server, diagnosis report from yet 
> another and consolidate both to produce a report and submit it to a 
> third location).
>
>  
>
> I am not sure if we are not handling such applications. But I feel we 
> need to define a solid boundary for "application" type.
>
> <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/gridcpr-wg/attachments/20051021/78dff34b/attachment.htm 


More information about the gridcpr-wg mailing list