[GRAAP-WG] WS-Agreement on top of WS-Notification

[Tianchao Li]

I understand. But what do you think if we clarify in the specification
to allow the usage of WS-Notification wherever appropriate?

Best regards,
Tianchao

t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
> This was in order to make it possible for implementations which do not
> use WS-Notification.
>
> Best Regards
> Toshi
>
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that WS-Notification is missing in the current specification:
>> 1. notification of agreement acceptance is currently via custom port type.
>> 2. the agreement status port does not extend the WS-Notification port type.
>>
>> Are there any specific reasons?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tianchao Li
>>
>> ====================
>> Research Staff
>> Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen
>> Germany
>> http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit
>>
>>
>> --
>>   graap-wg mailing list
>>   graap-wg at ogf.org
>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
>>     
>
> -------
> NEC 中央研究所　主席技術主幹
> 中田　登志之
> Toshiyuki Nakata
> Executive Chief Engineer
> Central Research Laboratories 
> NEC Corporation
> +81-44-431-7653
>
>