[GRAAP-WG] New Public Comments List

[t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com]

Tianchao:
Please repost your proposal to

https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listTopics/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_ws_agreement_spec_0


(I think either an updated WSDL file or a file with just the changes should be fine.) 

That way, it will be officially recorded so that it can be tracked.

Best Regards
Toshi



> The changes only improves specific details of WSDL and not affecting the
> other part of the specification document (kind of editorial changes?).
> But I was not sure whether I should provide the updated WSDLs as
> separate files or directly update the WSDL in the word file. In fact,
> the my post to the maillist on Oct. 5th already contains the updated
> WSDLs, and nobody objects these improvements but still nobody has
> committed to change the word file accordingly. That's why I'm proposing
> to change the word file directly.
> 
> Regards,
> Tianchao
> 
> Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
>> Hi Tianchao,
>>
>> the time you did sent the the WSDL the spec was already frozen except
>> for editorial changes. As Toshi wrote you should post the changes
>> as comment to the tracker. The public comment period ends end of November.
>> You should use the version of the spec as base that is used for
>> the public comments:
>>
>> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/sfmain/do/downloadAttachment/projects.ggf-editor/tracker.submit_ggf_draft/artf3388?id=atch4282
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Wolfgang
>>
>>
>>
>> Tianchao Li schrieb:
>>   
>>> Sure, the recommended improvements was already posted to the maillist
>>> (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html). It has
>>> been over a month and nobody seems to reject those improvements, I would
>>> like to start to have them documented. Now, the question is of course
>>> which is the latest version of the document I should work on as a basis?
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Tianchao
>>>
>>> t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hi Tianchao :
>>>> Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers?
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Toshi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> As was posted previously in the maillist
>>>>> (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I
>>>>> would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL
>>>>> definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this
>>>>> Word file?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Tianchao Li
>>>>>
>>>>> Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but
>>>>>> Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Thank you very much Andreas!) so 
>>>>>> posting again in case someone else also tries...
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>> Toshi
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> Toshiyuki Nakata 中田　登志之
>>>>>> Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 
>>>>>> 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
>>>>>> Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
>>>>>> Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035)
>>>>>> Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509) 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>   graap-wg mailing list
>>>>>>>   graap-wg at ogf.org
>>>>>>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>             
>>>> -------
>>>> NEC 中央研究所　主席技術主幹
>>>> 中田　登志之
>>>> Toshiyuki Nakata
>>>> Executive Chief Engineer
>>>> Central Research Laboratories 
>>>> NEC Corporation
>>>> +81-44-431-7653
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>> --
>>>   graap-wg mailing list
>>>   graap-wg at ogf.org
>>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
>>>     
>>
>>   
> 
> --
>   graap-wg mailing list
>   graap-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg

-------
NEC 中央研究所　主席技術主幹
中田　登志之
Toshiyuki Nakata
Executive Chief Engineer
Central Research Laboratories 
NEC Corporation
+81-44-431-7653