[GRAAP-WG] minutes from 12/20 telecon

[Omer F. Rana]

Dear Jim,

Thanks for this. Very useful.

Just a couple of things for the next OGF meeting:

1.   At the last meeting we had agreed to develop some use cases. I was 
wondering what the progress on this
      was -- perhaps, we could identify what work needs to be done on 
this prior to the OGF 19 meeting?

2.   There was also discussion about Interop at the last WS-Agreement 
session + workshop. What issues do we
      need to consider? Can we get people to demonstrate their 
WS-Agreement implementations at the next OGF19
      meeting? Perhaps, it would be useful to prepare for what exactly 
this session should feature?

regards
Omer

Jim Pruyne wrote:

> Are attached.
>
> --- Jim
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>	    Minutes from the December 20, 2006 GRAAP Telecon
>
>Attendees
>---------
>Jim Pruyne
>Toshi Nakata
>Wolfgang Ziegler
>
>Discussion
>----------
>
>>From the most recent comments as shown in Toshi's spreadsheet in email
>dated 12/8:
>
>1) Jim will edit the text accordingly.
>
>2) Has been completed
>
>3) Many affiliations are incorrect.  We will remove them since it may
>   be impossible to track them constantly.
>
>4) Agreed, but outside scope.
>
>5) It need not apply to a web service, so we need not specify more
>   clearly.  Section 3 does talk about this issue in itemized list
>   part 2.
>
>6) Agreed.  Perhaps the ValueUnit and ValueExpr should be wrapped in a
>   tag which can be replicated within the Penalty tag.  Let's forward
>   for discussion to Asit & Heiko and the mailing list.
>
>7) Agreed, but we cannot fix it.
>
>8) We think we've done this.
>
>9) Done.
>
>10) Done.
>
>11) Jim will check to see if we should be more "spec. friendly" with a
>    SHOULD or MAY statement somewhere.
>
>12) Consensus is that Tiancho's suggestions make sense.  
>
>13 - 16) We'd like to consult the WSDL authors (Heiko)
>
>17) Done.
>
>18) This is as we intended, but we need some clarification text.  Jim
>    to do this.
>
>19) Done.
>
>* We'll have our next telecon early in Jan., particularly when we have
>  discussion on the open issues that leads us to believe we can
>  resolve on the telecon.  Most likely date is Jan. 10.
>
>* We still hope to make interop. discussion a primary topic at the
>  next OGF meeting in North Carolina.
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>  graap-wg mailing list
>  graap-wg at ogf.org
>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
>

-- 
http://www.cs.cf.ac.uk/User/O.F.Rana/index.html / work-fax:+44(0)29-2087-4598
work:+44(0)29-2087-5542 / other:+44(0)7956-299981 / distributed collaborative
computing / room n2.14 / school of computer science / cardiff university 
  queen's buildings / newport road / cardiff cf24 3aa / wales / uk