[graap-wg] minutes from 4/5 telecon

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Heiko: Thank you very  much for checking, 
Just to make sure.

How about expressions like,

/wsag:ServiceTermState
This element contains the state of a service term, one of the following
top-level elements: 

in  P.37

or expressions like:

/wsag:ServiceTermState/wsag:NotReady in P.37 

compared to 

/wsag:ServiceTermStateList/wsag:NotReady in P.49?

Best Regards
Toshi
-----
Toshiyuki Nakata 中田　登志之
Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035)
Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509) 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heiko Ludwig [mailto:hludwig at us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 5:25 AM
> To: t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
> Cc: GRAAP-WG; Jim Pruyne; owner-graap-wg at ggf.org; 
> t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
> Subject: Re: [graap-wg] minutes from 4/5 telecon
> 
> 
> Toshi, 
> 
> there are Elements (contained in the list types) with these 
> respective names. No types, though. Hence, I think describing 
> the element it ok. 
> 
> Heiko 
> 
> -----
> Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
> IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 
> 10598 hludwig at us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160,  mob. +1 646 
> 675 8469 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Toshiyuki Nakata <nakata at mtg.biglobe.ne.jp> 
> 
> 04/07/2006 11:23 AM
> Please respond to
> t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
> 
> To
> t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
> cc
> Heiko Ludwig/Watson/IBM at IBMUS, Jim Pruyne 
> <jim_pruyne at hp.com>, GRAAP-WG <graap-wg at gridforum.org>, 
> owner-graap-wg at ggf.org Subject
> Re: [graap-wg] minutes from 4/5 telecon
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry: I might have not been too clear.
> To clarify:
> I've no problem with the actual XML schema.
> I'm only worried about whether it is OK to refer to  non-defined
> constructs namely  <wsag:ServiceTermState> and 
> <wsag:GuaranteeTermState>
>  in the pseudo-schema.
> 
> If that is what you mean by the following I 'm quite happy.
> >>the idea being that, on a domain level, subtypes of different
> >> name spaces can be nested in.
> 
> 
> best regards
> Toshi
> 
> Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
> 
> > Hi Heiko:
> > thank you very much about looking into the schema.
> > 
> > My problem had been that in Sections 7.2 and Section 7.3
> > There are descriptions of pseudo schema for
> > <wsag:ServiceTermState> and
> > <wsag:GuaranteeTermState>
> > 
> > but not in the actual schema.
> > Is this OK?
> > 
> > Best Regards
> > Toshi
> > 
> > Heiko Ludwig wrote:
> > 
> >> Regarding my todo:
> >>
> >> I didn't get to validating the schema in time prior to the Friday 
> >> call. However, we do have the TermStateType in the schema.
> >>
> >>   <xs:complexType name="TermStateType">
> >>     <xs:choice minOccurs="0">
> >>         <xs:any namespace="##other" 
> processContents="lax"/>         
> >> <!--Processing and Idle only as substates of Ready-->
> >>         <xs:element name="Processing" 
> type="wsag:InnerTermStateType"/>
> >>         <xs:element name="Idle" type="wsag:InnerTermStateType"/>
> >>     </xs:choice>
> >>     <xs:attribute name="termName" type="xs:string"/>
> >>   </xs:complexType>
> >> There is no separate GuaranteeTermStateType but a 
> >> GuaranteeTermStateListType since they always come in lists 
> in our port 
> >> types. the idea being that, on a domain level, subtypes of 
> different 
> >> name spaces can be nested in.
> >>
> >> As to my understanding and as things look to me, this is 
> ok. However, 
> >> we should verify the whole schema, anyway.
> >>
> >> Heiko
> >>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
> >> IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598
> >> hludwig at us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160,  mob. +1 646 675 8469
> >> http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jim Pruyne <jim_pruyne at hp.com> Sent by: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org
> >> 04/05/2006 11:12 AM
> >>
> >> To
> >> GRAAP-WG <graap-wg at gridforum.org>
> >> cc
> >>
> >> Subject
> >> [graap-wg] minutes from 4/5 telecon
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Are attached.  Note that the next call will be on Friday, 
> 4/7, at the 
> >> usual time of day.  Reminder announcement to follow.
> >>
> >> --- Jim
> >>
> >>
> >>                      Minutes from the April 5, 2006 GRAAP Telecon
> >>
> >> Attendees
> >> ---------
> >> Toshi Nakata
> >> Jim Pruyne
> >> Chris Dabrowski
> >> Asit Dan
> >> Wolfgang Ziegler
> >> Heiko Ludwig
> >>
> >> Discussion
> >> ----------
> >>
> >> - On updated termination diagram:
> >>   * Asit to send a note on the mailing list to verify that 
> we really
> >>     have a transition from PendingAndTerminating to
> >>     ObservedAndTerminating.  None of us seem to be able to 
> come up with
> >>     a message sequence that would cause that to happen.
> >>   * Asit will do an additional diagram to show the initial 
> states that
> >>     may be seen.
> >>
> >> - Spreadsheet row 10: Heiko to validate the schema as it relates to
> >>   ServiceTermState and GuaranteeTermState.  Heiko to post those
> >>   changes back to the mailing list, and we'll determine follow-up
> >>   steps on the next call (which is on Friday).
> >>
> >> - The next call will be on Friday, 4/7, same time of day!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>