[graap-wg] minutes from 4/5 telecon

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Sorry: I might have not been too clear.
To clarify:
I've no problem with the actual XML schema.
I'm only worried about whether it is OK to refer to  non-defined
constructs namely  <wsag:ServiceTermState> and <wsag:GuaranteeTermState>
  in the pseudo-schema.

If that is what you mean by the following I 'm quite happy.
 >>the idea being that, on a domain level, subtypes of different
 >> name spaces can be nested in.


best regards
Toshi

Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:

> Hi Heiko:
> thank you very much about looking into the schema.
> 
> My problem had been that in Sections 7.2 and Section 7.3
> There are descriptions of pseudo schema for
> <wsag:ServiceTermState> and
> <wsag:GuaranteeTermState>
> 
> but not in the actual schema.
> Is this OK?
> 
> Best Regards
> Toshi
> 
> Heiko Ludwig wrote:
> 
>> Regarding my todo:
>>
>> I didn't get to validating the schema in time prior to the Friday 
>> call. However, we do have the TermStateType in the schema.
>>
>>   <xs:complexType name="TermStateType">
>>     <xs:choice minOccurs="0">
>>         <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>         
>> <!--Processing and Idle only as substates of Ready-->
>>         <xs:element name="Processing" type="wsag:InnerTermStateType"/>
>>         <xs:element name="Idle" type="wsag:InnerTermStateType"/>
>>     </xs:choice>
>>     <xs:attribute name="termName" type="xs:string"/>
>>   </xs:complexType>
>> There is no separate GuaranteeTermStateType but a 
>> GuaranteeTermStateListType since they always come in lists in our port 
>> types. the idea being that, on a domain level, subtypes of different 
>> name spaces can be nested in.
>>
>> As to my understanding and as things look to me, this is ok. However, 
>> we should verify the whole schema, anyway.
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
>> IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598
>> hludwig at us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160,  mob. +1 646 675 8469
>> http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim Pruyne <jim_pruyne at hp.com> Sent by: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org
>> 04/05/2006 11:12 AM
>>
>> To
>> GRAAP-WG <graap-wg at gridforum.org>
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> [graap-wg] minutes from 4/5 telecon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Are attached.  Note that the next call will be on Friday, 4/7, at the 
>> usual time of day.  Reminder announcement to follow.
>>
>> --- Jim
>>
>>
>>                      Minutes from the April 5, 2006 GRAAP Telecon
>>
>> Attendees
>> ---------
>> Toshi Nakata
>> Jim Pruyne
>> Chris Dabrowski
>> Asit Dan
>> Wolfgang Ziegler
>> Heiko Ludwig
>>
>> Discussion
>> ----------
>>
>> - On updated termination diagram:
>>   * Asit to send a note on the mailing list to verify that we really
>>     have a transition from PendingAndTerminating to
>>     ObservedAndTerminating.  None of us seem to be able to come up with
>>     a message sequence that would cause that to happen.
>>   * Asit will do an additional diagram to show the initial states that
>>     may be seen.
>>
>> - Spreadsheet row 10: Heiko to validate the schema as it relates to
>>   ServiceTermState and GuaranteeTermState.  Heiko to post those
>>   changes back to the mailing list, and we'll determine follow-up
>>   steps on the next call (which is on Friday).
>>
>> - The next call will be on Friday, 4/7, same time of day!
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
>