[graap-wg] Terminal Fault(Id-26)

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Sorry please ignore the previous question., I hadn't realized that there 
were two kinds of faults.

<xs:complexType name="TerminalFaultType">

<xs:complexType name="ContinuingFaultType">

<xs:complexContent>

<xs:extension base="wsbf:BaseFaultType"/>

</xs:complexContent>

</xs:complexType>

<xs:element name="ContinuingFault" type="wsag:ContinuingFaultType"/>

<xs:element name="TerminalFault" type="wsag:TerminalFaultType"/>

and that Continuing Fault is used while Termination Fault isn't.

Best Regards
Toshi

Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:

> Hi:For ID-26 (Terminal Fault) I looked in the comment Tracker and
> It seems the response is that it had been deleted..
>
> From last night's discussion, may I understand that I would try to see 
> if it could be resurrected to
> be used to give hints to the Agreement Initiator what had been wrong?
>
>
> Best Regards
> Toshi
>
> By: Tiziana Ferrari <https://forge.gridforum.org/users/ferrari/>
> Subject: TerminalFault 
> <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1019>[ Reply ] 
> <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1019#reply>
> Date: 2005-02-17
>
> It looks like the TerminalFault defined under the agreement type schema:
> <xs:complexType name="TerminalFaultType"> <xs:complexContent> 
> <xs:extension base="wsbf:BaseFaultType"/> </xs:complexContent> 
> </xs:complexType>
> is not used anywhere else. Is this intentional?
>
> By: <None>
> Subject: group response
> <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1152>[ Reply
> ] <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1152#reply>
> Date: 2005-04-28
>
> Correct, it has been deleted.
>
>

-- 
Toshiyuki Nakata ?????
Internet System Laboratories NEC 
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210)
Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)