[graap-wg] asynchronous binding

Toshiyuki Nakata nakata at mtg.biglobe.ne.jp
Mon Feb 21 08:19:13 CST 2005


Hi Karl:


> but unfortunately my archive does not retain the Word document
> attachment, so I cannot review the specific changes. (Does anyone know
> of a public archive where I can easily retrieve such GRAAP messages
> with attachments?)
> 

Please refer to Section 8.4 in
http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/graap-wg/2004/11/doc00000.doc

which had been refererred from
http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/graap-wg/2004/11/msg00004.html


> Just based on the above summary, I would say that I am proposing we
> drop the createAgreementGetResult operation in favor of an equivalent
> binding-level behavior to reliably get (or "re-get" by polling) the
> result of the existing createAgreement call in case it takes too long
> for the baseline bindings.  I am also proposing that we attempt to
> incorporate his notion of a "reverse direction" createAgreementResult
> operation (which I separated as acceptAgreement and rejectAgreement)
> into a repair for the now underspecified and broken symmetric
> agreement pattern.
> 

> Does anybody else have opinions on these issues?  


 >
Will there be a
> GRAAP call today (Monday 20 Feb)?

 From Jim's subsequen mail, probably no..
Best Regards
Toshi
> 
> 
> karl
> 

-- 
Toshiyuki Nakata
t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
+81-44-431-7653
(NEC Internal 8-22-60210)





More information about the graap-wg mailing list