[glue-wg] about Glue2.1 draft, CLOUD and GPGPU extension

[Alessandro Paolini]

Hi John,

For me the preferred day would be May 17th because:

- today and tomorrow EGI.eu is closed for national holidays in Netherlands
(King's Day), and if I have to prepare some slides I won't have enough time
for may 3rd (moreover it clashes a bit with another phone meeting scheduled
that afternoon, by chance with US people)

- From May 31st to June 2nd I'm being busy in a FitSM training event

Cheers,
Alessandro
Il 26/apr/2016 20:14, "Navarro, JP" <navarro at mcs.anl.gov> ha scritto:

> Dear GLUE-WG,
>
> Would any of the following dates work for a teleconference to discuss the
> new Cloud specification?
>
> May 3
> May 17
> May 31
>
> at the usual: 15:30-17:00 Central Europe, 8:30-10:00 AM US Central
>
> Please reply with hay/nay by COB this Friday.
>
> Regards,
>
> JP Navarro
>
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:55 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini at egi.eu>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> please find in the attachement a new version of the draft with the
> modifications suggested by Stephen:
>
> - all the new objects called "CloudComputeXxx" were renamed
> "CloudComputingXxx" to be consistent with the existing objects
>
> - Modified the definition of Benchmark class including the relation to
> cloud objects; deleted the Benchmark paragraph in the cloud section
>
> - updated the StorageAccessProtocol definition adding the relation with
> ToCloudComputingService
>
> - after the recent changes, it needs to produce a new version of some of
> the UML class diagrams
>
> With Stephen, we also noticed that there are still some open questions
> that need to be discussed in the group:
>
> - The naming of ToCloudStorageService is maybe not ideal since it
> suggests that it relates to a CloudStorageService object, which isn't true.
> We may want to discuss that more in the group. An option could be
> *CloudComputingServiceToStorageService*, but that's quite long - for the
> 2.0 schema we decided to make it shorter, but that creates a small problem
> now. Or maybe it should have a different naming style, since it's somewhat
> different to the existing object.
> Other options: *CloudToStorageService* (to keep the name short), ...
>
> - in the StorageService definition is not included the relation to
> ToComputingService class so do we need to include the association to
> ToCloudComputingService? Same question for StorageService and
> ToStorageService / ToCloudStorageService classes
>
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
>
> --
> Dr. Alessandro Paolini
> Operations Officer - EGI.eu <http://egi.eu>
> Science Park 140
> 1098 XG Amsterdam
> The Netherlands
> skype: alessandro.paolini.egi
> *********************************
> "I believe in the power of laughter and tears"
>     "as an antidote to hatred and terror"
>           "A day without laughter"
>              "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin
> <glue2.1-draft_v0.2.doc>_______________________________________________
> glue-wg mailing list
> glue-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/attachments/20160427/08b3552f/attachment.html>