[glue-wg] No audio

[JP Navarro]

Florido,

Sorry the phone connection failed.

I think you, Stephen, and the working group chairs (myself and/or Shiraz) should go thru the document, as you suggest, and review all the changes,  but first...

So that we can produce a concise public summary of the changes, I would like for us to agree on two things:
1) are the proposed changes in Stephen's slides complete and accurate?
2) for you and Stephen to classify each change into
   a) good idea,
   b) neutral (no clear benefit and no harm), and
   c) not a good idea.
We can do this during our next working group teleconference after Stephen presents the rest of his slides.

Before that next teleconference, I'd like to request that you reply to this working group with the following information about the proposed changes that you know are contentious: DIT/insertion points and perhaps GLUE2GroupID.
- What role needs or benefits from this information in LDAP rendering specification: the user, the information provider, the BDII/ldap administrators?

Florido and Stephen,

Are you available the next two GLUE WG teleconference dates September 24 or October 6 at 4 PM CET (9 AM CST) so that Stephen can present the rest of his slides?

Thanks,

JP

On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Florido Paganelli <florido.paganelli at hep.lu.se> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I couldn't follow the end of the meeting as suddenly I couldn't hear
> you, I guess it's because Shiraz dropped out of the server.
> 
> I hope we will manage to find an agreement to close the LDAP document. I
> think me, Stephen and a mediator and whoever wants to follow the
> proceedings should sat down in front of the document and accept-reject
> changes. In this way we can also quickly show how things are done in
> reality and comment about it.
> 
> As I said, since the integration effort was done during EMI, the
> implemented technology follows almost all the lines described in that
> the July 2012 review. And we tried to stick to the real implementation
> as much as possible.
> So I don't understand Stephen's fear that current implementations do not
> follow these guidelines. They actually do!
> 
> I really think the only dispute is about the DIT tree. I already said
> many times I'd like at least implementation examples to be there, but if
> this is so bad, it can be dropped to some other document.
> 
> I am in for some follow-up meeting to complete Stephen's slides, but
> mind that I sent a couple of slides with ARC's view on things.
> At the cost of repeating myself, Stephen slides are the the best summary
> I've seen about what happened in LDAP so far, as they focused discussion
> on real problems we had to face during integration.
> 
> Cheers,
> Florido
> -- 
> ==================================================
> Florido Paganelli
>   ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration
>   System Administrator
> Lund University
> Department of Physics
> Division of Particle Physics
> BOX118
> 221 00 Lund
> Office Tel: 046-2220272
> Email: florido.paganelli at REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se
> Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli
> ==================================================
> _______________________________________________
> glue-wg mailing list
> glue-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg