[glue-wg] Planning for OGF 28

stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk
Thu Mar 11 05:14:30 CST 2010


glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
Steve Fisher said:
> I agree - and this implies that a Service must have at least one
endpoint otherwise it is useless. 

No, it doesn't - we have potential use cases for internally-accessible
services, e.g. a classic SE which only uses "file" access. Anyway this
discussion is rather running off the rails: the fact is that the schema
does allow publication of a Service without an Endpoint, and there isn't
likely to be any particular difficulty in assigning it a QualityLevel.
All I was intending to point out was that the existing text description
of the attribute doesn't cover such a case - probably it's enough to add
a suitably-placed "usually"!

Stephen
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.


More information about the glue-wg mailing list