[glue-wg] Draft SE Schema
Burke, S (Stephen)
S.Burke at rl.ac.uk
Tue Jun 12 04:16:28 CDT 2007
glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org
> [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Maarten.Litmaath at cern.ch
said:
> What happened to the Storage Component etc. that we first
> wanted for v1.3?
> I think the SRM group will need to digest this and comment...
It would be good to get some experience with the 1.3 schema ... I would
like to see a concrete use case for the storage component, the reason I
argued against it for 1.3 was that it wasn't clear to me that there was
a real need for it.
Stephen
More information about the glue-wg
mailing list