[gin-auth] The VO Groups and Roles for GIN-GGF-ORG

[Oscar Koeroo]

Hi,

Well... I can be very creative with the non-usefull values :-)
I'll create some of those when I have nothing else to do. You'll be the 
first to get some bogus new groups for free to try and enjoy.

cheers,

    Oscar



Jensen, J (Jens) wrote:

>Hi,
>
>[Oops, thought I'd sent this earlier.  Off it goes.]
>
>I'd have thunk it's useful to create random roles and
>groups for interop-now-testing.  Just assign them
>randomly and don't use them for access control to
>anything important.
>
>I for one would like to have some funny stuff in my proxies
>so I can see what happens.  And perhaps some relatively
>lightweight way of sticking new stuff in there.
>
>They should be able to coexist with the "serious" groups
>that Dane mentioned.
>
>Thanks,
>			--jens
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gin-auth at ggf.org [mailto:owner-gin-auth at ggf.org]On Behalf Of
>Dane Skow
>Sent: 08 March 2006 03:33
>To: Erwin Laure
>Cc: Oscar Koeroo; gin-auth at ggf.org
>Subject: Re: [gin-auth] The VO Groups and Roles for GIN-GGF-ORG
>
>
>
>I would agree that we should not push on roles for this first wave.  
>It would be a good discussion to carry forward after the first push  
>to see if we can agree on a few basic roles before the SC06 timeframe  
>(but after GGF17 timeframe).
>
>I don't know that we should be particularly reluctant to create  
>groups though.
>I think it might be a good idea to create groups for the different  
>focus groups (info,data,auth,jobs) to provide that option of  
>discrimination as well as some basic "practice", but that might  
>complicate the administration (estimates on what the overhead would  
>be ?)  I can't think of an immediate need off-hand (but then I didn't  
>immediately grok the need for a VOMS like others did ;-)
>
>Dane
>
>On Mar 7, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Erwin Laure wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Oscar,
>>
>>Do we really need them now? This is likely to open a can of worms and
>>for our first goals up to SC06 I don't think we really need them.
>>Thoughts?
>>
>>-- Erwin 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: owner-gin-auth at ggf.org [mailto:owner-gin-auth at ggf.org]
>>>On Behalf Of Oscar Koeroo
>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:12 PM
>>>To: gin-auth at ggf.org
>>>Subject: [gin-auth] The VO Groups and Roles for GIN-GGF-ORG
>>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I'll probably need to create groups and roles in the VO for
>>>various reasons.
>>>This will probably be yet another discussion topic, but which
>>>(sub)groups and roles must be created (besides the defacto
>>>standard 'VO-Admin' role)?
>>>
>>>cheers,
>>>
>>>    Oscar
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>