[gin-auth] The VO Groups and Roles for GIN-GGF-ORG

[Dane Skow]

I would agree that we should not push on roles for this first wave.  
It would be a good discussion to carry forward after the first push  
to see if we can agree on a few basic roles before the SC06 timeframe  
(but after GGF17 timeframe).

I don't know that we should be particularly reluctant to create  
groups though.
I think it might be a good idea to create groups for the different  
focus groups (info,data,auth,jobs) to provide that option of  
discrimination as well as some basic "practice", but that might  
complicate the administration (estimates on what the overhead would  
be ?)  I can't think of an immediate need off-hand (but then I didn't  
immediately grok the need for a VOMS like others did ;-)

Dane

On Mar 7, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Erwin Laure wrote:

> Hi Oscar,
>
> Do we really need them now? This is likely to open a can of worms and
> for our first goals up to SC06 I don't think we really need them.
> Thoughts?
>
> -- Erwin 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gin-auth at ggf.org [mailto:owner-gin-auth at ggf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Oscar Koeroo
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:12 PM
>> To: gin-auth at ggf.org
>> Subject: [gin-auth] The VO Groups and Roles for GIN-GGF-ORG
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'll probably need to create groups and roles in the VO for
>> various reasons.
>> This will probably be yet another discussion topic, but which
>> (sub)groups and roles must be created (besides the defacto
>> standard 'VO-Admin' role)?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>>     Oscar
>>
>>
>