[GHPN-WG] Minutes from meeting @ OGF20 Manchester

[Franco Travostino]

We're so very blessed to have Cees' commitment to be with us for some more
years to come!

-franco

On 5/10/07, Cees de Laat <delaat at science.uva.nl> wrote:
>
> Dear GHPN'ers,
>
> Upfront a remark from myself. As most of you now know my term as
> AD-infrastructure ended and I indicated not to be available for
> another term because of mostly workload @ University of Amsterdam
> reasons. However, I indicated last year, when Dimitra was asked to
> become the sole chair, that I might wanted to to help her after my
> AD-term and so happens this week she twisted my arm.
> Therefore, the process is to ask consensus from the RG and approval
> from the AD's. At the meeting there was no objection and the present
> AD RHJ gave the oke. And as you know decisions need to be verified on
> the mailinglist. So if anyone objects me being co-chair, please feel
> free to say so.
>
> I took notes at the meeting, see below. Please inform me for
> additions, corrections, etc.
>
> Best regards,
> Cees.
>
>
> Here are the rough notes from the GHPN meeting OGF20, 18h00-19h30
> wednesday may 9th.
>
> agenda:
>
> Dimitra Simeonidou(GHPN-RG)
> Group Discussion GHPN
> SessionAgenda:
> 1. Agenda bashing and administration (Dimitra Simeonidou) [5']
> 2. Update on GUNI (Georgios Zervas) [20]
> 3. Enlightened Computing Update: An HD-class example (Jon MacLaren)[15]
> 4. SIP protocol for Grid Networks (Aldo Campi) [15]
> 5. Research Challenges for Optical Grid Networks (Marc De Leenheer) [15]
> 6. Introducing EC-GIN: Europe-China Grid InterNetworking (Sven
> Hessler)  [20]
>
> - agenda bashing, no changes
>
> - Dimitria announced she asked previous AD Infrastructure Cees de
> Laat to become co-chair of this group. He said yes if group approves.
> Group ha no objection. Announce on mailinglist and ask AD to approve
> and submit to Joel.
>
> - We welcome Richard Hughes Jones as AD-Infrastructure.
>
> - update on GUNI by Zervas.
> Q  What is the benefit of grid aware gmpls layer
> A can react faster, can dynamically change path, milliseconds scale
> adaptation, net-awareness for optimization, dynamic allocation.
> Q what grid projects support this
> A Phosphorus, Enligtend, g-lambda
>
> - Enlightend project , mc Laren
> (I missed the Q/A from Richard Hughes Jones)
>
> - SSIP talk by Aldo Campi
> Q SIP - IMS vs SIP in GRID. Wy SIP rather than SOAP? Complexity of
> sip stack is big, same overhead as XML, SIP has not good security
> Q why is sip beteer
> A sip is proven to scale, implementations for many services
>
> - Research Challenges for Optical Grid Networks, Mark de Leenheer
>   Q what is relation with grid of hybrid netw (cirq plus obs)
>       if you change internet in web app, what does that mean for grid
> apps.
> A can remove complexity from the tcp stack
>
> - 6. Introducing EC-GIN: Europe-China Grid InterNetworking (Sven
> Hessler) Q/A Please fill Questionaire from GIN. Put it on mailing
> list.
> Q do not use tcp because of slow recovery
> A are not going to use tcp. Suggestion from audience: Discuss with IRTF.
>
> Meeting concluded on time.
>
> Best regards,
> Cees.
> --
> http://www.science.uva.nl/~delaat/
>



-- 
http://www.francotravostino.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ghpn-wg/attachments/20070511/f00446cc/attachment.html