[egr-rg] ARCH Area meeting

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Nobutoshi Thank you very much for the comments.

Actually, there had been 1.5 Motivations ->S1.6 Scenario->1.7 Goals
and then during the meeting we discussed that motivation and goals were 
topo much overlapping and should
be merged. We merged them on the fly and had place them after the scenario,
but I agree, we should probably move it to before the scenario.

Best regards
Toshi

Nobutoshi Sagawa wrote:

>Toshi
>
>I am sorry I could not atted the EGR meeting at Seoul.
>
>My comment is that the section 1.7 (Goals) should really be placed
>before 1.6 (Scenarios),  since a senario is normally drawn in order
>to achive given goals?
>
>-Nobutoshi Sagawa, Hitachi Ltd.
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-egr-rg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-egr-rg at ggf.org] On 
>>Behalf Of Toshiyuki Nakata
>>Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 5:06 PM
>>To: Satoshi Itoh
>>Cc: egr-rg at gridforum.org
>>Subject: Re: [egr-rg] ARCH Area meeting
>>
>>
>>Hi. Please find attached the pdf of the ppt that we used in 
>>the RG-session. I hope Satoshi uploads it to the Gridforge.
>>
>>Future plans, before sending the template to everyone in the 
>>Grid world, we hope to try an internatl tryout during the 
>>next two-three weeks.
>>
>>So, please everyone,
>>1)Look into the template and make comments there.. (Uh I 
>>think Robert is 
>>also going to do
>>some reworking based on the comments given in the session.) 
>>2)Try to see if you can come up with Usecases using the template.
>>
>>
>>Satoshi Itoh wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I attended to the 3/14's Arch Area meeting.
>>>I have reported that:
>>>There is not so much progress from GGF12.
>>>The first session was canceled.
>>>We are preparing the template for the usecase documents and discuss 
>>>about it at the second session on 3/15.
>>>
>>>There were two thing about EGR-RG in the Area meeting.
>>>1) Is the OGSA usecase document managed by EGR-RG ?
>>>  I did not remember that it was determined in the group.
>>>  So it is on the space between OGSA-WG and EGR-RG.
>>>  We should discuss it.
>>>2) Does the EGA open a template for the requirement?
>>>  If so, it may be used for our template ?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Is this really EGA?
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I have also heard that the EGR-RG is expected to be a 
>>>      
>>>
>>liaison between 
>>    
>>
>>>EGA and GGF from the participant to INFOD-WG. But it is not official 
>>>request...
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>If necessary I can contact a colleague of mine (NEC's also 
>>participating 
>>in EGA)
>>but I had assumed there would
>>be someone from the OGSA in this liason.
>>
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>    
>>
>>>See you at the today's session on 15:30 at crystal ballroom 3.
>>>
>>>Satoshi (I)
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>-- 
>>We have moved to a new Office!!
>>Toshiyuki Nakata ?????
>>Internet System Laboratories NEC 
>>t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
>>1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
>>Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
>>Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210)
>>Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
We have moved to a new Office!!
Toshiyuki Nakata ?????
Internet System Laboratories NEC 
t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210)
Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)