[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA conformance rules

[Peter Troeger]

Thanks for the editing. I would love to mention the test suite, but  
only as suggestion. Otherwise, we would need to establish a better  
process for the test suite maintenance and coverage.

I will include the updated text in the IDL spec.

Peter.

Am 22.12.2006 um 18:23 schrieb Daniel Templeton:

> Peter,
>
> Some edits:
>
> A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its   
> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions   
> from this document are addressed in the language binding. An   
> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming  
> language  and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if the API  
> implementation  and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language  
> binding document, or to this document. In case of conflicts, the  
> language-specific binding  specification has precedence.
>
>
> Did you want to mention the compatibility tests for certain languages?
>
> Daniel
>
> Peter Troeger wrote:
>> Some updated version:
>>
>> A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its   
>> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and  
>> suggestions  from this document are considered in the language  
>> binding. An  implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular  
>> programming language  and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if  
>> the API implementation  and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0”  
>> language binding document, or  this document. In case of  
>> conflicts, the language-specific binding  specification has  
>> precedence.
>>
>> It now provides a clearer definition of 'conformance'.
>>
>> Peter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 22.12.2006 um 10:27 schrieb Peter Troeger:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got a comment for the IDL spec that we do not have a clear
>>> declaration of "conformance". Therefore, here is my suggestion for
>>> some text block in the IDL spec:
>>>
>>> -- snip
>>>
>>> A language binding document is allowed to use “DRMAA 1.0” in its
>>> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
>>> from this document are considered in the language binding. An
>>> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming  
>>> language
>>> and DRM system can be called “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if (A) the API
>>> implementation and behavior confirms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language
>>> binding document, or this document. In case of conflicts, the
>>> language-specific binding specification has precedence.
>>>
>>> -- snip
>>>
>>> What do you think ?
>>> Peter.
>>> --
>>>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>>>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>>>
>>
>> --
>>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>>
>