[DRMAA-WG] IDL spec comments from GFSG

[Peter Tröger]

Dear Piotr,

>> Thanks for the clarification ! We have a ready-to-publish Java binding,
>> based on the IDL spec.
> 
> Will they differ much from current DRMAA 1.0 language bindings (C, Java)?

The latest Java binding has one method renaming (without parameter 
change), in order to apply to the common IDL base. The SGE 
implementation will mark the old method name as deprecated and simply 
add the new one. This might be also feasible for you.

As you can see in the last meeting minutes, DRMAA group is still 
discussing about the effect for the version numbers. The current advice 
is to stick with your implementation(s) until the C / Java language 
binding reached some OGF document status.

Thanks and regards,
Peter.