[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA-WG Nov, 14, 2006 call

[Daniel Templeton]

I won't be able to make the call.  I have another meeting I have to go to.

Daniel

Hrabri Rajic wrote:
> The bi-weekly DRMAA call is scheduled for 16:00 UTC (8:00PDT - Pacific
> Daylight Time /10:00CDT/ 17:00 Central Europe). All Participants should use
> the following information to reach the conference call:
>  
> ------------------------------------
> * Toll Free Dial In Number for North America:   1 800 867-8609
> * Toll Free Dial In Number for Germany:         0 800 101-4546
> * Int'l Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number:      +49 069509594678
> * ACCESS CODE: 7223898
> ------------------------------------
>
> Attachments to this email:
>
>       - Oct 31 meeting minutes
>
> Meeting Agenda:
>
> A. Meeting secretary for this meeting?
> 		
> B. Acceptance of the Oct 31, 2006 meeting minutes
>
> C. Admin
>       - Language independent DRMAA recommendation document status
>
> F. Open/general issues discussion
> 	- IDL and Java bindings doc progress
> 	- misc
>
>        
> Cheers,
>
>       Hrabri
>
>  
>
>
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Oct 31, 2006 call meeting minutes
> From:
> Peter Troeger <peter.troeger at hpi.uni-potsdam.de>
> Date:
> Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:49:02 -0600
> To:
> DRMAA Working Group <drmaa-wg at ogf.org>
>
> To:
> DRMAA Working Group <drmaa-wg at ogf.org>
>
>
> Meeting minutes of the DRMAA Oct 31, 2006 con call:
>
> - Last meeting minutes accepted, including participant list
> - Hrabri will ask area directors for status of DRMAA submission (done)
> - IDL: Agreed that SPI concept will be removed from spec
>         - Particular implementation is language-dependent
> - IDL: Querying of exitStatus / termSignal when information is not 
> available (ifExited / ifSignaled == false)
>         - Should lead to "IllegalStateException" in IDL spec
>         - Case not clearly described in C binding
>         - Existing C implementations seem to use 
> DRMAA_ERRNO_INVALID_ARGUMENT in this case
>         - Peter will create tracker item with deferred status for C 
> spec, 
> due to pending DRMAA submission
> -  IDL: Problem of reading / writing implementation-dependent job 
> template attributes
>         - C-like solution needed for DRM-independent DRMAA 
> applications with 
> DRM-dependent code parts
>         - Agreement that get_attribute() and set_attribute() will be 
> again 
> part of JobTemplate interface
>         - Language bindings must always provide JobTemplate 
> attributes, and 
> may offer also get_attribute() / set_attribute() functions when needed
> - IDL tracker item 1729
>         - Relax demand so that basic IDL types are always 
> pass-by-value, and 
> 'complex' types have a unified semantic, defined by the language binding
>         - Peter will answer the tracker
> - Hrabri will ask area directors for operational procedures regarding 
> "IDL 1.1" submission
>
> Regards,
> Peter.
>
>
> -- 
>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>