[drmaa-wg] DRMAA for Torque

[Daniel Templeton]

Thanks for pointing that out.  I'll file an issue against SGE, and add
the missing error code.

Daniel

Peter Troeger wrote On 02/04/06 21:46,:

>Am 04.02.2006 um 21:26 schrieb Peter Troeger:
>
>  
>
>>>Meanwhile I'm surprised by something: in the ST_SUPPORTED_ATTR  
>>>test the
>>>program checks the drmaa_get_next_attr_name() return code,  
>>>comparing it
>>>with DRMAA_ERRNO_SUCCESS and then with
>>>DRMAA_ERRNO_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE. If the return code is neither of
>>>these values, the test fails. I understood that the
>>>drmaa_get_next_attr_name() function was supposed to return
>>>DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_MORE_ELEMENTS when the end of the list is reached.  
>>>That's
>>>what my lib does, and the therefore the test fails.
>>>
>>>Where am I wrong ?
>>>      
>>>
>>Nowhere. I will fix this immediately. The more interesting question  
>>is while earlier tests with other implementations didn't brought  
>>that up (Dan, Andreas ?).
>>    
>>
>
>Ok, I found it. The C-binding spec 1.0 introduced  
>DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_MORE_ELEMENTS as new error code (see also tracker  
>issue #1173). SGE, Condor and the current test suite where mainly  
>implemented according to C-binding v0.95, so this is a historical bug.
>
>Peter.
>
>  
>
>>Thanks !
>>
>>Peter.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Thanks for the help.
>>>
>>>Matthieu Cargnelli
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>

-- 
***************************************************
*        Daniel Templeton   UMPK18 x83749         *
*       Staff Engineer, Sun N1 Grid Engine        *
***************************************************
*   An "intellectual" is a man who takes more     *
* words than he needs to say more than he knows.  *
*                       -Dwight D. Eisenhower     *
***************************************************