[drmaa-wg] Questions

[Rajic, Hrabri]

>> [ .. ]
>>
>> The routine return code would need to indicate a compound error; BTW
we
>> do not have such error code defined, and the detailed error message
>> would need to detail what happened.
>
>In other words, the spec completely fails to address this case.
>Something to keep in mind for 1.1 or 2.0.
>

It looks like no specifics are necessary for defining the compound
error.  Should we give it a thought now and put it in the revised v1.0
if it remains relatively simple to define and implement?

-H