[drmaa-wg] Monitoring DRMAA jobs by other means

[Rajic, Hrabri]

Hi,

I have being reading one of the BES-WG debates and this comment from Ian
Foster made me think about enhancing DRMAA job monitoring:

"I suggest (as we have also suggested in earlier communications to
BES-WG) that we should instead allow the user to specify a set of
activities that are to be monitored or controlled in terms of their
properties, not names. E.g., "activities that belong to me", "activities
that involve executable Foo", "activities that have been running for
over 2 hours."

This is 2.0 stuff for DRMAA.  Nevertheless, it could be worthwhile to
monitor the end user requests like ones in this proposal.

-Hrabri