[drmaa-wg] Tracker item status for IDL-spec
Peter Troeger
peter.troeger at hpi.uni-potsdam.de
Tue Apr 19 09:49:54 CDT 2005
Hi,
Andreas suggested to analyze the open tracker items with respect to the
latest IDL-spec.
I looked at all tracker items which have either the status "delayed" or
"open" in the category "DRMAA". For the current version (0.31) of the
IDL-spec, we have the following situation:
Already solved with the IDL-spec v0.31:
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=309
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=780
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=855
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1123 (but we may
need to open a new tracker item for the multiple session issue)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1124
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1125
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1147
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1151
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1174
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1289
Still open, also for the IDL-spec:
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=805
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=890
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1126
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1171
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1172
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1175
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1176
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1177 (needs
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1178 (needs
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1180 (needs
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1183 (needs
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1184 (needs
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1186
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1187
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1188
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1189
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1190
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1191
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1357
Should we mark the solved items with the "Closed" status ? This seems to
be appropriate since there was an agreement that the IDL-spec acts as
base for the next DRMAA document. I would take care of this.
Regards,
Peter.
More information about the drmaa-wg
mailing list