[drmaa-wg] Tracker item status for IDL-spec

Peter Troeger peter.troeger at hpi.uni-potsdam.de
Tue Apr 19 09:49:54 CDT 2005


Hi,

Andreas suggested to analyze the open tracker items with respect to the 
latest IDL-spec.
I looked at all tracker items which have either the status "delayed" or 
"open" in the category "DRMAA". For the current version (0.31) of the 
IDL-spec, we have the following situation:

Already solved with the IDL-spec v0.31:

https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=309
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=780
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=855
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1123    (but we may 
need to open a new tracker item for the multiple session issue)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1124
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1125
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1147
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1151
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1174
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1289

Still open, also for the IDL-spec:

https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=805
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=890
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1126
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1171
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1172
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1175
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1176
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1177  (needs 
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1178  (needs 
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1180  (needs 
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1183  (needs 
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1184  (needs 
discussion about the remote invocation case)
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1186
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1187
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1188
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1189
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1190
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1191
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?aid=1357

Should we mark the solved items with the "Closed" status ? This seems to 
be appropriate since there was an agreement that the IDL-spec acts as 
base for the next DRMAA document. I would take care of this.

Regards,
Peter.









More information about the drmaa-wg mailing list