[dmis-bof] Comments on the charter?

[Dave Berry]

Note that the OGSA WG is working on an Information Model to describe a
range of Grid Resources.  There is work in progress to see whether a
subset of CIM, suitably extended, will be appropriate, influenced by the
GLUE schema work. (I haven't been following this in detail so I'm not
sure of the exact current status).

Intially they're looking at this as applied to execution management
services.  It would be good (IMO) to extend this to data transfer.

I got the impression that the UR work is also biased towards job
execution, but this was just from a quick skim of the document.

Dave.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dmis-bof at ggf.org [mailto:owner-dmis-bof at ggf.org] On Behalf
Of Michel Drescher
Sent: 16 December 2005 10:37
To: Peter Kunszt
Cc: allcock at mcs.anl.gov; Hiro Kishimoto; dmis-bof at ggf.org; Ian Foster
Subject: Re: [dmis-bof] Comments on the charter?

On 14 Dec 2005, at 17:13, Peter Kunszt wrote:
>>>>  - A sort of pet project of mine is monitoring / troubleshooting.  
>>>> I would like to potentially include elements in the WSDL or state 
>>>> that is exposed that would enable better/easier monitoring and 
>>>> troubleshooting.  For instance, some sort of unique job identifier 
>>>> that can be passed down to children, so that you can trace the 
>>>> chain back when you have a failure.
>>>
>>> yes, statistics gathering is another one. very important to have - i

>>> already sent the wsdl's we have today to this list..
>>
>> Shame on me, but I didn't check these WSDL's. Are they sort of 
>> compatible to a usage like RUS-WS's output?

I meant the GGF Usage Record working group: https:// 
forge.gridforum.org/projects/ur-wg/

Cheers,
Michel