[DFDL-WG] Tracker 333 - new bitOrder byteOrder combimation - dever to DFDL 2.0 ?

[Mike Beckerle]

See https://redmine.ogf.org/issues/333

This tracker was to add the leastSignificantBitFirst bigEndian combination
to the legal values. for bitOrder byteOrder

I propose this is deferred to DFDL 2.0.

While we have seen one case where this does appear to be used, it is not
significant enough to warrant this change in DFDL v1.0.

Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
<http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20191011/5ee2b845/attachment.html>