[DFDL-WG] terminology corrections on initiatedContent descriptions

[Steve Hanson]

Agree with both corrections, and their categorisation.

Regards
 
Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday 



From:   Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To:     DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
Date:   10/10/2019 18:23
Subject:        [DFDL-WG] terminology corrections on initiatedContent 
descriptions
Sent by:        "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>



Section 14 For property initiatedContent

The sentence "If the child is optional then it is deemed to have been 
found when its initiator has been found." should use consistent 
terminology of "known to exist" as follows "If the child is optional then 
it is known to exist when its initiator is found."

Section 15 as well, also for initiatedContent

"The branch is deemed to have been found when its initiator has been 
found." replace "The branch is known to exist when its initiator is 
found."

I would categorize these corrections as "minor/typographical". 


Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | 
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are 
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
--
  dfdl-wg mailing list
  dfdl-wg at ogf.org
  
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ogf.org_mailman_listinfo_dfdl-2Dwg&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=AJa9ThEymJXYnOqu84mJuw&m=6m3vEyaxmu3dwCLgD5a5X07Z2UQ2aK4gvK_uQo3L_d8&s=CU3lU51qKgMDE2izF8ZjGFypHChb5ggCRqEUamFcmA4&e= 


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20191011/42344b64/attachment-0001.html>