[DFDL-WG] New Experimental Feature document: dfdl:emptyElementParsePolcy
Steve Hanson
smh at uk.ibm.com
Fri Nov 22 11:57:15 EST 2019
Mike
The new document looks good, the descriptions of the property values are
clear and simple.
One comment of yours I need to follow up though. You said:
" Bug in this doc. Daffodil is not inserting defaults here (doesn’t
implement default insertion when parsing.) Fixed with new language you
suggested. "
Are you saying that if Daffodil parses an occurrence and determines it has
the empty rep, and there is a default value on the element declaration,
that the default value is not used? If so then what happens? Further, if
you subsequently change Daffodil so it does use the default value, you
have silently changed parsing behaviour in an incompatible way. IBM DFDL
similarly does not use default values when parsing, but to prevent a
future incompatible behaviour change, if we find a zero-length occurrence
and there is a default value, we throw a runtime SDE.
Regards
Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday
From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To: Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com>
Cc: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
Date: 16/10/2019 19:19
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DFDL-WG] New Experimental Feature
document: dfdl:emptyElementParsePolcy
I have revised this per your comments, and uploaded a new revision. Link:
https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13596?download=
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:23 PM Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Mike
Some significant comments on this.
Regards
Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday
From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
Date: 14/10/2019 19:58
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DFDL-WG] New Experimental Feature document:
dfdl:emptyElementParsePolcy
Sent by: "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
Per one of our trackers I uploaded an "official" document to describe this
experimental feature.
gwde-dfdl-experience-7-emptyElementParsePolicy.docx
This describes the feature as we have implemented it in Daffodil. There
has been some discussion on this proposal already, particularly on whether
the enum values for the property are appropriately chosen so that they
clearly identify the different behaviors.
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20191122/26721917/attachment.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list