[DFDL-WG] clarification needed - choice with both dispatch and discriminator
Steve Hanson
smh at uk.ibm.com
Fri Jan 27 11:45:08 EST 2017
The choiceBranchKey resolves the choice PoC and the subsequent
discriminator resolves any outer PoC. Andy I have modified your words - do
you agree?
Regards
Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
From: Andrew Edwards/UK/IBM at IBMGB
To: mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com
Cc: dfdl-wg at ogf.org
Date: 27/01/2017 03:57
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] clarification needed - choice with both
dispatch and discriminator
Sent by: "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
Section 15.1.2 also says the following:
When a match is found, it is as if a dfdl:discriminator had evaluated to
true on that branch. It is selected as resolution of the choice, and there
is no backtracking to try other alternative selections if a processing
error occurs.
I have always taken that to mean that a match with direct dispatch is
taken as definitive, and if a following discriminator check on that choice
branch fails, then it is a valid error situation. That is to say, the
model is accurately saying that the data doesn't match the entire choice.
It matches enough to look like direct dispatch can make a selection and
resolve the choice to that branch, but a further discrimination check has
proved that the entire choice doesn't match the data.
Andy Edwards
Software Engineer
E-mail: andy.edwards at uk.ibm.com
Snail-mail: MP211, Hursley park, Hursley, WINCHESTER, Hants, SO21 2JN
Phone (internal): 247222
Phone (external): 44-1962-817222
Desk: DE3 F16
The Feynman problem solving Algorithm:
1) Write down the problem
2) Think real hard
3) Write down the answer
-- Murray Gell-mann in the NY Times
----- Original message -----
From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
Sent by: "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
To: "dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
Cc:
Subject: [DFDL-WG] clarification needed - choice with both dispatch and
discriminator
Date: Wed, Jan 25, 2017 11:05 PM
Section 15.1.2 says you can have both dfdl:choiceBranchKey and a
discriminator on a choice branch. But it doesn't clarify what the meaning
of having both is.
My assumption is that if you have both, the choice is resolved by the
choiceDispatchKey/choiceBranchKey, so any discriminator would be about
some surrounding point of uncertainty outside the choice.
I wanted to confirm this is the intention.
The alternative semantics would be that the discriminator is redundant,
and so if it evaluates to true that means nothing at all since the choice
branch has already been discriminated by the
choiceDispatchKey/choiceBranchKey. If the discriminator evaluates to
false, or errors when it evaluates, that would be a parse error that would
cause the entire choice to fail.
Comments?
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20170127/16d51779/attachment.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list