[DFDL-WG] draft r20

[Mike Beckerle]

I have posted draft r20 to redmine.


   - Resolved a few comment bubbles raised by steve h. - moved a few things
   from Appendix on standard charsets to glossary, improved examples there.
   - Changed header and footer to August 2014.
   - Added missing "Code Point" glossary entry.
   - Minor editorial fixes.


I believe the only thing left is to get the bit-order materials finalized
and in.

One open: Steve H suggested appendix tables and figures should be numbered
A.1, A.2, B.1, etc. I am uncertain how to do this, so r20 is content
changes, if I can figure out how to do the numbering that will be another
revision.


Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
<http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>



On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Mike
>
> Reviewed draft r18, and created draft r19. A few editorial changes, plus
> some editorial comments, plus a comment about the Glossary definition of
> Bit Position for when bitOrder is added. I'll let you post to Redmine in
> case you want to make any more edits.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Steve Hanson
> Architect, *IBM DFDL*
> <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/se-dfdl/index.html>
> Co-Chair, *OGF DFDL Working Group* <http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/>
> IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
> *smh at uk.ibm.com* <smh at uk.ibm.com>
> tel:+44-1962-815848
>
>
>
> From:        Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
> To:        "dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>,
> Date:        25/07/2014 02:34
> Subject:        [DFDL-WG] draft r18 on redmine
> Sent by:        dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I posted spec r18 to redmine.
>
> This incorporates all the errata as of the 1.5 experience doc 1.
>
>    - One exception - the errata about implementation-defined and
>    implementation-dependent. I went through and updated all the places where
>    this was not correctly stated per Jonathan's document.
>    - However, I did not create an appendix also listing all these things.
>    That turns out to be hard to do, and redundant (you end up copying text
>    blocks - then they're in two places....)
>    - I think if we want an index to everyplace that
>    "implementation-defined" and "implementation-dependent" appear in the
>    document, that's what an index is for, so we should generate one and put
>    those in as indexed terms.
>
> I added the appendix of DFDL Standard Character Set Encodings, which
> includes both 7-bit and 6-bit flavors now.
>
> I believe the last thing to do is bit order, but that should be reviewed
> as a separate document first.
>
>
> Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
> *www.tresys.com* <http://www.tresys.com/>
> Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
> subject to the *OGF Intellectual Property Policy*
> <http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>
> --
>  dfdl-wg mailing list
>  dfdl-wg at ogf.org
>  https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20140731/1de8c853/attachment.html>