[DFDL-WG] draft r20

[Steve Hanson]

34.2    Conventions
All indexing of positions in this document ... 
Should say appendix.
Glossary: The definitions of LSB and MSB are not exactly symmetric. MSB 
has missing words in a couple of places.
Regards
 
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848



From:   Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To:     "dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>, 
Date:   31/07/2014 22:12
Subject:        [DFDL-WG] draft r20
Sent by:        dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org



I have posted draft r20 to redmine.

Resolved a few comment bubbles raised by steve h. - moved a few things 
from Appendix on standard charsets to glossary, improved examples there.
Changed header and footer to August 2014.
Added missing "Code Point" glossary entry.
Minor editorial fixes. 

I believe the only thing left is to get the bit-order materials finalized 
and in.

One open: Steve H suggested appendix tables and figures should be numbered 
A.1, A.2, B.1, etc. I am uncertain how to do this, so r20 is content 
changes, if I can figure out how to do the numbering that will be another 
revision.


Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | 
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are 
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy



On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Mike 

Reviewed draft r18, and created draft r19. A few editorial changes, plus 
some editorial comments, plus a comment about the Glossary definition of 
Bit Position for when bitOrder is added. I'll let you post to Redmine in 
case you want to make any more edits. 



Regards
 
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848 



From:        Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com> 
To:        "dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>, 
Date:        25/07/2014 02:34 
Subject:        [DFDL-WG] draft r18 on redmine 
Sent by:        dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org 



I posted spec r18 to redmine.

This incorporates all the errata as of the 1.5 experience doc 1. 
One exception - the errata about implementation-defined and 
implementation-dependent. I went through and updated all the places where 
this was not correctly stated per Jonathan's document. 
However, I did not create an appendix also listing all these things. That 
turns out to be hard to do, and redundant (you end up copying text blocks 
- then they're in two places....) 
I think if we want an index to everyplace that "implementation-defined" 
and "implementation-dependent" appear in the document, that's what an 
index is for, so we should generate one and put those in as indexed terms.
I added the appendix of DFDL Standard Character Set Encodings, which 
includes both 7-bit and 6-bit flavors now.

I believe the last thing to do is bit order, but that should be reviewed 
as a separate document first. 


Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | 
www.tresys.com 
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are 
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy 
--
 dfdl-wg mailing list
 dfdl-wg at ogf.org
 https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
--
  dfdl-wg mailing list
  dfdl-wg at ogf.org
  https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20140801/2a4fa38d/attachment.html>