[DFDL-WG] validating expressions on elements in a choice or unordered sequence
Mark Frost
FROSTMAR at uk.ibm.com
Fri Apr 11 06:22:31 EDT 2014
When we were implementing unordered sequences, this raised some questions
around evaluating relative paths in expressions, for elements in a choice
or unordered sequence :
DFDL spec: (gwdrp-dfdl-v1.0.4 section 15)
"When processing a choice group the parser validates
any contained path expressions. If a path
expression contained inside a choice branch refers
to any other branch of the choice, then it is a
schema definition error."
1. I'm not clear what benefit this restriction on path expressions
gives.
It seems redundant since in any single instance of a choice group, if the
branch being processed exists, then by definition none of it's sibling
branches exist. Any expression path referring to a non-existent branch
would correctly return <empty sequence>
If the choice group is inside a repeating structure, then expressions
referring to choice branches within other instances of the choice could be
useful.
Should an expression referring to branches in other instances of a choice
cause a schemadef error?
Example
expression on el_b could be { fn:count(../../el_choice/el_a) }
- parent
[sequence]
- el_choice [minOccurs=5 maxOccurs=5]
[choice]
- el_a
- el_b
2. Should an expression that potentially refers to branches in the
choice cause a schemadef error?
Example
identically named elements in and out of a choice
expression on el_c could be { fn:count(../el_a) }
- parent
[sequence]
- el_a
- el_b
- [embedded choice group]
- el_a
- el_c
Regards,
Mark Frost
_____________________________________
MP 211, IBM Hursley, Winchester, SO21 2JN
Phone: (01962) 817009 or x247009
Email: frostmar at uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20140411/c8df9ce4/attachment.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list