[DFDL-WG] Alternate Initiators?

[Mike Beckerle]

dfdl:initiator="Message-ID Message-Id"

i.e., it's a whitespace separated list of alternatives.

There's also a property called dfdl:ignoreCase="yes", but that would allow
"mEssAge-iD" as well, which you probably don't want.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Garriss Jr., James P.
<jgarriss at mitre.org>wrote:

>  Consider the following IMF headers:****
>
> ** **
>
> Message-ID: <
> CACQ76nh2VDypuwm1aHc1-s8ZmmyXg8XEosS6af6yurkVdT+8QQ at mail.gmail.com>****
>
> Message-Id: <208E8372-A9D9-468A-9B4B-BD97ED28F64C at garriss.org>****
>
> ** **
>
> Notice the difference:  ** **
>
> ** **
>
>     Message-ID: ****
>
>     vs ****
>
>     Message-Id:****
>
> ** **
>
> Per the RFC, only the first is legal, but both are used in practice, and
> we’d like to allow either.  In our DFDL schema, “Message-ID” is an
> initiator, but suddenly we have two alternate initiators for the same
> element.****
>
> ** **
>
> How we model this in DFDL?****
>
> ** **
>
> TIA****
>
> --
>   dfdl-wg mailing list
>   dfdl-wg at ogf.org
>   https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
>



-- 
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20130227/ec63f66a/attachment.html>