[DFDL-WG] clarification: pad/trim and nilKind='literalValue' for text numeric elements
Steve Hanson
smh at uk.ibm.com
Thu Oct 25 03:13:19 EDT 2012
The dfdl:textNumberJustification property applies to the element
regardless. When parsing and nilLiteralValue, trimming takes place before
the value is examined for nil value. (That rule enables a nilValue like
'NIL' to be used in scope for many fixed length elements regardless of
length).
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To: dfdl-wg at ogf.org,
Date: 24/10/2012 19:00
Subject: [DFDL-WG] clarification: pad/trim and
nilKind='literalValue' for text numeric elements
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org
Consider:
<element name="e" type="xs:int" nillable="true"
dfdl:lengthKind="explicit" dfdl:length="4"
dfdl:nilValue="-"
dfdl:textPadChar="%SP;"
dfdl:textNumberJustification="right"
dfdl:representation="text"/>
Is a nil justified on the right, or are only number values justified on
the right?
That is, will [- ] be interpreted as nil, or only [ -]
A literal nil value is effectively textual syntax, and has nothing to do
with whether the field is number or string,
so one might legitimately say that textStringJustification applies to it.
But then again....
--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL WG Co-Chair
Tel: 781-330-0412
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20121025/1c87612c/attachment.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list