[DFDL-WG] new action item needed: DFDL URN specification
Mike Beckerle
mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 10:35:57 EDT 2012
Introduction:
Using URLs as identifiers has caused no end of problems. E.g., in DFDL we
have http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/dfdl-1.0/ as an identifier. W3C has
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema and others.
W3C has badly regretted establishing this convention, as they have farms of
servers that do nothing but quickly return 404 errors to save network-aware
applications the network-timeout delay that would otherwise occur.
There are parties interested in exploiting DFDL who want DFDL schemas to
NOT contain network URLs because it simply creates a concern about network
access whenever a DFDL schema is inspected/used.
Pre-Proposal:
The new way to do this is with URNs which would look roughly like this:
urn:ogf:dfdl:standard:dfdl-1.0. The whole point is that some other
mechanism is used to establish correspondences between these and any
resources in file systems, networks, or built-in to implementations. One
such mechanism is called XML Catalog.
The point is that it is a name in a managed namespace which cannot be
confused with a network protocol URL.
OGF is already establishing urn:ogf, and an ogf subgroup has already
proposed urn:ogf:network for network resources. DFDL schemas aren't network
resources so we don't want to be a substructure underneath network.
Some other mechanism is used to establish correspondences between these and
any resources in file systems, networks, or built-in to implementations.
One such mechanism is called XML Catalog.
Summary:
An action item should be to specify DFDL urn, submit to OGF as a proposed
namespace, and then produce errata/spec changes to specify its use.
This requires a small design activity to specify a scheme for the
sub-structure of the DFDL URNs (i.e., scheme for the stuff after
urn:ogf:dfdl:...) where we want standard identifiers for versions of the
standard, but we probably also want a few other things (e.g., I would like
a space for implementations to identify themselves, i.e., an
implementation-specific sub-area within our URNs.)
Our existing URLs can be compatible (deprecated) practice vs the preferred
URNs.
--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL WG Co-Chair
Tel: 781-330-0412
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20121024/4ebf29ba/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list