[DFDL-WG] short form on xs:schema?

Suman Kalia kalia at ca.ibm.com
Sun Dec 4 18:55:20 CST 2011


One way to view this annotation would be as if it is defined on the 
default format at the xs:schema..   Question would be what if dfdl:format 
at xs:schema also has dfdl:encoding specified - which one would win ?..


Suman Kalia
IBM Canada Lab
WMB Toolkit Architect and Development Lead
Tel: 905-413-3923 T/L 313-3923
Email: kalia at ca.ibm.com

For info on Message broker
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/zones/businessintegration/wmb.html





From:   Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To:     dfdl-wg at ogf.org
Date:   12/02/2011 05:46 PM
Subject:        [DFDL-WG] short form on xs:schema?
Sent by:        dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org




I don't know that we ever talked about this.

Most schema constructs support short form

<xs:element ... dfdl:encoding="utf-8" />

Does the xs:schema itself support short form for the "default" format 
properties?

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="...."
    dfdl:encoding="utf-8">
...
</xs:schema>



-- 
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL WG Co-Chair 
Tel:  781-330-0412
--
  dfdl-wg mailing list
  dfdl-wg at ogf.org
  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20111204/11232801/attachment.html 


More information about the dfdl-wg mailing list