[DFDL-WG] short form on xs:schema?
Suman Kalia
kalia at ca.ibm.com
Sun Dec 4 18:55:20 CST 2011
One way to view this annotation would be as if it is defined on the
default format at the xs:schema.. Question would be what if dfdl:format
at xs:schema also has dfdl:encoding specified - which one would win ?..
Suman Kalia
IBM Canada Lab
WMB Toolkit Architect and Development Lead
Tel: 905-413-3923 T/L 313-3923
Email: kalia at ca.ibm.com
For info on Message broker
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/zones/businessintegration/wmb.html
From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
To: dfdl-wg at ogf.org
Date: 12/02/2011 05:46 PM
Subject: [DFDL-WG] short form on xs:schema?
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org
I don't know that we ever talked about this.
Most schema constructs support short form
<xs:element ... dfdl:encoding="utf-8" />
Does the xs:schema itself support short form for the "default" format
properties?
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="...."
dfdl:encoding="utf-8">
...
</xs:schema>
--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL WG Co-Chair
Tel: 781-330-0412
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20111204/11232801/attachment.html
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list