[DFDL-WG] Numbers with multiple ranges

Mon Mar 9 09:27:40 CDT 2009

That was what I was originally going to propose (more correctly any 
annotations on members of the union are ignored) but it would mean the 
scoping rules for simple types would be different when unions are 
involved.  I am ok with that if others are.

Regards

Steve Hanson
Programming Model Architect
WebSphere Message Brokers
Hursley, UK
Internet: smh at uk.ibm.com
Phone (+44)/(0) 1962-815848

Suman Kalia <kalia at ca.ibm.com> 
09/03/2009 13:45

To
mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com
cc
dfdl-wg at ogf.org, dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org, Steve Hanson/UK/IBM at IBMGB
Subject
Re: [DFDL-WG] Numbers with multiple ranges

Mike  - I see your point..  In this case, how about allowing DFDL 
annotations only on the union and no DFDL annotations on the members of 
the union. 

Suman Kalia
IBM Toronto Lab
WMB Toolkit Architect and Development Lead
WebSphere Business Integration Application Connectivity Tools 

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/zones/businessintegration/wmb.html

Tel : 905-413-3923  T/L  969-3923
Fax : 905-413-4850 T/L  969-4850
Internet ID : kalia at ca.ibm.com 

From: 
"Mike Beckerle" <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com> 
To: 
"'Steve Hanson'" <smh at uk.ibm.com> 
Cc: 
dfdl-wg at ogf.org 
Date: 
03/09/2009 09:38 AM 
Subject: 
Re: [DFDL-WG] Numbers with multiple ranges

But you can parse it. 

If it's just the validation, you still have ambiguitities e.g., suppose I 
form a union of two types, each derived from xs:int, but with different 
DFDL representations. There's a conflict then, how is that resolved. Rules 
for "consistency" among two DFDL annotations will be complex. E.g., is an 
int with a 31 bit representation compatible wiht an int with 32 bit 
representation? - shouldn't be unless both are unsigned. Etc. 

...mike 

From: Steve Hanson [mailto:smh at uk.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:46 AM
To: DFDL
Cc: dfdl-wg at ogf.org
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] Numbers with multiple ranges

It's a validation issue. I have a packed decimal number with ranges 0-100, 
200-300, 400-500. I can't parse and validate this with DFDL. WTX can 
handle this today. 

Regards

Steve Hanson
Programming Model Architect
WebSphere Message Brokers
Hursley, UK
Internet: smh at uk.ibm.com
Phone (+44)/(0) 1962-815848 

DFDL <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com> 
07/03/2009 04:49 

To
Steve Hanson/UK/IBM at IBMGB 
cc
"dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org> 
Subject
Re: [DFDL-WG] Numbers with multiple ranges

What does this have to do with representation/ format ? 

Seems totally out of scope to me. 

...mikeb 

On Mar 6, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

One of the existing non-XML parsers from IBM is capable of modelling an 
integer or decimal with non-contiguous ranges, eg, 0-100, 200-300, 
400-500.  It is also possible to model this using XML Schema, using a 
user-defined simple type which is a union of simple type restrictions. 

However it is not possible to model this in DFDL because unions are not 
supported. A choice could be used, but that would give different named 
elements in the resultant infoset depending on the value, which is not 
ideal. 

I believe this is use case that we should consider for DFDL 1.0.  We could 
decide to allow unions, but with a constraint that the members of the 
union had to be restrictions of the same built-in type, and that clashing 
DFDL properties on the members was an error. I believe the existing 
scoping rules for visiting types would still apply ok. No annotation 
appears on the xs:union only on the xs:simpleType as currently. The net 
effect is that our parsing rules are the same as currently, but we gain 
validation capability. 

I am not in favour of more widespread support for unions. I don't have a 
compelling use case for union of different logical types, eg, xs:dateTime 
and xs:string. 

Your thoughts are welcome. 

!-- integer range 0 - 100 
<xsd:simpleType name="intRange1"> 
  <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> 
    <xsd:maxInclusive value="100"/> 
    <xsd:minInclusive value="0"/> 
  </xsd:restriction> 
</xsd:simpleType> 

!-- integer range 200 - 300 
<xsd:simpleType name="intRange2"> 
  <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> 
    <xsd:maxInclusive value="300"/> 
    <xsd:minInclusive value="200"/> 
  </xsd:restriction> 
</xsd:simpleType> 

!-- integer range 400-500 
<xsd:simpleType name="intRange3"> 
  <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> 
    <xsd:maxInclusive value="500"/> 
    <xsd:minInclusive value="400"/> 
  </xsd:restriction> 
</xsd:simpleType> 

!-- Union of above types 
<xsd:simpleType name="intRange"> 
  <xsd:union memberTypes="intRange1 intRange2 intRange3"/> 
</xsd:simpleType> 

!-- Union of anonymous types being restrictions of above types 
<xsd:simpleType name="intRangeLocal"> 
  <xsd:union> 
    <xsd:simpleType> 
      <xsd:restriction base="intRange1"/> 
    </xsd:simpleType> 
    <xsd:simpleType> 
      <xsd:restriction base="intRange2"/> 
    </xsd:simpleType> 
    <xsd:simpleType> 
      <xsd:restriction base="intRange3"/> 
    </xsd:simpleType> 
  </xsd:union> 
</xsd:simpleType> 

!-- Union of anonymous types being local restrictions 
<xsd:simpleType name="intRangeLocalRestrictions"> 
  <xsd:union> 
    <xsd:simpleType> 
      <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> 
        <xsd:minInclusive value="0"/> 
        <xsd:maxInclusive value="100"/> 
      </xsd:restriction> 
    </xsd:simpleType> 
    <xsd:simpleType> 
      <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> 
        <xsd:minInclusive value="200"/> 
        <xsd:maxInclusive value="300"/> 
      </xsd:restriction> 
    </xsd:simpleType> 
    <xsd:simpleType> 
      <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> 
        <xsd:minInclusive value="400"/> 
        <xsd:maxInclusive value="500"/> 
      </xsd:restriction> 
    </xsd:simpleType> 
  </xsd:union> 
</xsd:simpleType> 

Regards

Steve Hanson
Programming Model Architect
WebSphere Message Brokers
Hursley, UK
Internet: smh at uk.ibm.com
Phone (+44)/(0) 1962-815848

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU 

--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU 

--
 dfdl-wg mailing list
 dfdl-wg at ogf.org
 http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20090309/27dd1541/attachment-0001.html 