[dcifed-wg] DCIFed status

alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de
Tue Jun 7 04:30:56 CDT 2011


Gary, Craig,

Am 30.05.2011 um 22:33 schrieb Gary Mazz:

--8<-- snip --8<--

> A paper on synergies between OCCI/CDMI/OVF is may be a little weak at this point, especially since there is no commitment from the DMTF of moving forward with this initiative.

Well, it depends on what kind of paper you think about. I'd be very happy to see this as a scientific publication somewhere. This would lift the endorsement requirement from DMTF, and still be something that can be referenced. @Thijs, Andy: what do you think?

Best,
Alexander

> On 5/30/2011 11:46 AM, Craig Lee wrote:
>> Alex, Gary, et al.,
>> 
>> I strongly encourage a short write-up on OCCI/CDMI/OVF.  These three standards were mentioned as a group multiple times at the NIST Cloud Standards Summit (both Alan and I attended).  This group also appears in the NIST Cloud Standards Roadmap -- the first complete draft should be available this June.  I can't promise this material would get into the Roadmap, but we need to make the strongest possible, defensible recommendations wrt existing and emerging standards for cloud computing.
>> 
>> Wrt Use Cases -- and broad use case requirements -- many sets of cloud use cases have been compiled, even among the NIST Cloud WGs.  If DCIFed wants to compile another set of use cases, I would recommend taking some time to at least review and comment on the other sets that have been compiled.  I agree with the use case requirements that Gary mentions in his earlier email.  I would add, though, that Vivek Kundra has said that _document management_, i.e., document workflow, is the single largest use case for the US gov.  (This is probably true for all governments!) It also seems to me that secure access through mobile devices, i.e., smartphones, is also high on the list.
>> 
>> --Craig
>> 
>> On 5/30/11 7:48 AM, alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de wrote:
>>> Hey Gary,
>>> 
>>> putting your last message to the list as well...
>>> 
>>> Am 23.05.2011 um 01:00 schrieb Gary Mazz:
>>> 
>>>> The other cloud groups are trying to coordinate.... We will need to leverage this work
>>> 
>>> Most definitely.
>>> 
>>>> NIST is looking to compiles a list standards, use cases and scenarios  that can be applied to cloud and distributed computing. We will need to leverage this work also.
>>> 
>>> Sure. Maybe we can do a short write up of how the OCCI/CDMI/OVF integration would address the NIST stuff. I remember Alan pointing me to some NIST standards wiki pages with a table of use cases and cloud desiderata -- would be a good starting point to show what the DCIfed integration is supposed to address, if we assume OCCI/OVF/CDMI to be this integration.
>>> 
>>>> I'm trying to put a cloud consumer working group together around DCI-Fed. Tony DiCenzo Director Standards committed Oracle's assistance. CA may also participate, if we ask nice. :) Use case and scenario work needs to proceed with the user community
>>> 
>>> That sounds very interesting. Can we help you with anything on this?
>>> 
>>>> I also just sent an email on "hot issues" from the largest IT consumer in the US Fed.., Its part of defining requirement areas for technical focus.
>>> 
>>> Yep, seen that. Comments in that mail.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Alexander
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dcifed-wg mailing list
>>> dcifed-wg at ogf.org
>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcifed-wg
> 



More information about the dcifed-wg mailing list