Sounds like Twitter to me:
   [1]https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/white-collar-crime-anti-corrupti
   on-fraud/1226418/supreme-court-preview-the-supreme-court-poised-to-addr
   ess-key-federal-wire-fraud-issue?email_access=on

   In the 2022-2023 term, the Supreme Court will address the definition of
   "property" under the federal wire fraud statute, which prohibits a
   person from "obtaining money or property by means of false pretenses."
   18 U.S.C. § 1343. The definition of "property" for the purposes of this
   statute has been much debated—need "property" be economic in nature?
   Must it be tangible? Can one's [2]admission to a university constitute
   "property"? Now, the Supreme Court may answer some of these questions
   in Ciminelli v. United States (Docket No. 21-1170).^1

   Mr. Ciminelli was convicted of wire fraud in connection with a
   bid-rigging scheme in the "Buffalo Billion" program, an economic
   development initiative in Buffalo, New York. The program was
   facilitated by Fort Schuyler, a nonprofit entity affiliated with the
   SUNY system, which issued requests for proposals ("RFPs") to solicit
   and accept bids for each project. The government argued that Mr.
   Ciminelli and others rigged this process by secretly tailoring certain
   RFPs to favor their companies on projects worth $750 million.

References

   1. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/white-collar-crime-anti-corruption-fraud/1226418/supreme-court-preview-the-supreme-court-poised-to-address-key-federal-wire-fraud-issue?email_access=on
   2. https://www.law360.com/articles/1331758/attachments/0