Expert testimony is often decisive. The standard governing its
   admissibility is therefore critically important.

   For years, federal practitioners have referred to that standard as the
   "Daubert" standard, for the Supreme Court's seminal decision in Daubert
   v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509U.S. 579 (1993).
   [1]https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/trials-appeals-compensation/1207
   626/don39t-say-daubert-reviving-rule-702?email_access=on

References

   1. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/trials-appeals-compensation/1207626/don39t-say-daubert-reviving-rule-702?email_access=on