On Sun, Apr 3, 2022, 8:59 AM professor rat <[1]pro2rat@yahoo.com.au>
   wrote:

     “I realized if you allow anyone to mint anything and sell it
     pseudonymously, plagiarism is built into that,” he said. “If your
     system is built on decentralization as a core building block,
     there’s just no fixing that problem. It’s just inherent in the
     fundamentals.”

     [2]https://decrypt.co/96637/nfts-have-a-problem-with-copyright-theft

   I did not read the link. But copyright is mostly defending large
   organisations this century, rather than its intended defense of the
   merit and value of creative individuals.

     Cryptoanarchy - in stark contrast - is a three-legged-stool
     Cypherpunks
     Subject: Everyone a remailer: Everyone a Mint: Everyone an assassin
     [3]https://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=100872510706876&w=2

   I usually see this the enforcement way: "oh no assassination" -- but
   now I see it is about p2p forthrightness.

In the developing labyrinth progress will be slower,but sure,toward
distributed,P-P,encrypted,alternate OS plug ins that will
accomplish all we seek to achieve.

But remember, please, the Law by which we live,
We are not built to comprehend a lie.
We can neither live nor pity, nor forgive,
If you make a slip in handling us you die!
--The Secret of the Machines-- Rudyard Kipling

   It's been a few decades, and a more direct and focused approach to the
   decentralised norm may be needed.
   I'm thinking of, for example, adding basic decentralised components to
   mainstream browsers or operating systems. Rather than add-on apps that
   only a few use -- see what parts the central projects might accept.
   Ideas.

References

   1. mailto:pro2rat@yahoo.com.au
   2. https://decrypt.co/96637/nfts-have-a-problem-with-copyright-theft
   3. https://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=100872510706876&w=2