coreboot is currently experiencing a small disagreement about removing
   the intel quark board from the tree. i'm experiencing paranoia around
   it.
   the arguments to plan to delete it are persistent and quick, and seem
   to generally completely ignore logic to the contrary.
   it would be appropriate to call something out or express important
   community practices, to protect the project, but with my paranoid
   psychosis I can't tell what's true and would contribute to the problem.
   problems don't seem immidiately imminent, but I feel responsible, and
   i've seen projects break apart a lot. it's unfortunate when proposals
   to remove things align with burdenedness or distractedness of those
   using or maintaining them. simply watching to learn hasn't really
   worked in the past, since I learn so poorly now.
   coreboot had its major deletion last decade, when swathes of boards
   were removed. the board i'm tinkering with porting forward was one of
   them.
   on a blockchain git system, i'd just follow the forks that don't delete
   stuff. but without p2p organisation, my fears start building; I imagine
   people coming in and removing every board from coreboot until it is
   empty! or removing boards that suppressed voices need at important
   times.
   gerrit: [1]https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63283
   mailing list
   thread: [2]https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.
   org/thread/YRJQIPVK5WHACT64TH42CLGD4TXG3XTS/
   I engaged some discussion on irc, dunno if that's logged though

References

   1. https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63283
   2. https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.org/thread/YRJQIPVK5WHACT64TH42CLGD4TXG3XTS/