I'm having trouble contining so writing down the formula:
   Basically, treat your coping and other present experiences from the big
   social influence coverups around 2014 as analogies for the story
   content. Use things around you or on the list to provide material. The
   story is about controlling a secret businessman and government
   contractor who uses mind control for profit and reputation, as
   researchers, workers, and commonpeople who struggle and inevitably
   succeed to take down his business and free everyone, while
   participating in controlling the world for him in various ways as parts
   of his various shell corps and social influence plans. The "rebels"
   socialise at a cafe where people continuously and casually talk about
   things that Boss engages millions and billions of dollars and diverse
   classified technology to cover up. The story centers around the rebel
   cafe and the worst victims of Boss's experimental and influence work
   who are crux in turning the tide of his efforts and have positions and
   knowledge and skills that seems incredibly powerful but that they can't
   easily effect or use very well, but this is described as being solely
   psychological from Boss's abuse, and also a researcher with a serious
   role in world history (rebel researcher / boss's "dead" wife) and the
   hero is a middle manager (rebel worker 2, an implanted + mind
   controlled mind control rebel who succeeds), roles from my feeling
   shapes. Boss actually changes the story while it is written to mutate
   to his preferences, which gets it spewed all over a mailing list before
   the change is complete, which impacts the patterns tasked with
   preventing such things. Roughly Boss may have pressed for himself be an
   injured victim to gain the heart of readers, for others than him to
   come across as aggressive and harmful, for the story to spread a
   concept of conflict, rebellion, and oppression, and for no business
   secrets to be included. The results relate to human instincts people in
   an environment of powerful automated influence of the human experience,
   counter to the preferences of those involved.
   When adding things to the story one can start by simply making up a
   casual interaction given the background and then assume that as normal
   and move forward or get bigger, and/or relate something important, and
   possibly making a joke of covering up things that are so sharply new
   and different (and impactful).
   We prefer not to speak in cover-up nor ridicule (or even
   assumption-guesses, not that not doing that should imply not preserving
   and sharing anything) but suspect that attempting to be more normal and
   human will just give more story material for a while longer.