On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, 7:20 PM grarpamp <[1]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

     On 12/18/21, Woody Wood <[2]thedogsh@gmail.com> wrote:
     > Sorry, but I thought this was cypherpunks. Not a place to push
     political
     > agendas and covid theories.
     >
     > I joined this list hoping to learn and engage in some cryptography
     > discussions.
     Yet another never before seen popup agent troll, whose first post is

   "lurker"

     Cpunks write code, they

     have to do it gratis

     for
     you

   no rudeness intended, just disagreement

     > They prefer politics instead of privacy
     Funny those that are too triggered by simple news of politicians
     slapping them in the face with their anti-privacy regimes, yes too
     triggered by mere presence of such topics, to realize that privacy
     is still very much alive and well as an underlying fundamental here.

   real political discussion of course involves clear discourse.
   one expects individual political groups to engage each other in more
   intense ways
   but we are doing more than this, in our ways.

     Without news, there would be no awareness and motivation to
     counter things, no efforts to try wielding crypto in battles that
     none even thought to consider or knew might need or could be
     fought, even without any posters interpretive commentary.

   news

     In fact there are years and years of threadposts on censorship and
     encrypted crypto political moves by politicians being made against
     human freedom, more freedom being removed and power added
     every day, giving you awareness that censorship anti-freedom
     globalism politician maneuvers Govt and Corp etc must be countered,
     exposed, fought. And what of the shatting upon those messengers.
     Crypto is free to talk and write here,
     quit whining and do that.

   to support crypto, support people speaking to support it
   be well

References

   1. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com
   2. mailto:thedogsh@gmail.com