[1]https://news.yahoo.com/kyle-rittenhouse-jury-return-second-135325648.html

A request from jurors in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial sparked debate in the courtr
oom over a drone video already played during testimony.

----------------
Jim Bell's comment:

Cypherpunks should advocate that whenever  such evidence is collected, it must b
e published immediately (hours?) albeit perhaps encrypted and concealed as to ex
act location.

Say, the first day, the public notation will show a circle inside of which the d
ata was taken would be 2000 miles in diameter, the second day 1000 miles diamete
r, more precise each day.  Like Craigslist does when locating a seller.  Eventua
lly, a few weeks later, the location will be identified to within 2 meters.

So, those collecting that evidence won't have an option to 'lose' or 'omit' or a
lter that evidence.  Everyone who wants a copy can have it, although initially e
ncrypted.  The cops/FBI won't be able to tamper with this evidence after its imm
ediate publication, without such fraud being detected later on when the full enc
ryption keys must be revealed to the publicly.

Don't bother arguing that 'cops' shouldn't be able to collect such evidence.  Ou
tdoors, on public property, is generally considered free for anyone to record, i
ncluding ordinary citizens.

I contend that the real danger is that law enforcement will be able to express b
ias by selectively disclosing (or concealing) such evidence, including manipulat
ing it later to conceal or misrepresent 'facts'.

References

   1. https://news.yahoo.com/kyle-rittenhouse-jury-return-second-135325648.html